sexta-feira, agosto 28, 2009

Hollywood Buzz #55

O que se diz lá fora sobre TAKING WOODSTOCK, de Ang Lee:

«TAKING WOODSTOCK has the freshness of something being created, not remembered.»
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times.

«Given a subject that has become synonymous with overblown mythmaking, its modesty becomes it.»
Stephen Holden, New York Times.

«A sort of let's-put-on-a-show summer-camp lark for director Ang Lee after the dramatic rigors of BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN and LUST, CAUTION, the picture serves up intermittent pleasures but is too raggedy and laid-back for its own good.»
Todd McCarthy, Variety.

«Lee captures the fractious, joyful, monstrously evolving mass it all was.»
Owen Gleiberman, Entertainment Weekly.

«All the tie-dye, reefer, skinny-dipping, split-screen cinematography (from Eric Gautier) and acid-trip psychedelics courtesy of Tiber's encounter with hippies (Paul Dano and Kelli Garner) can't make up for the film's major sin of omission: the music.»
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone.

1 comentário:

Os Filmes de Frederico Daniel disse...

"Taking Woodstock": 4*

"Taking Woodstock" é um filme bastante bom, com uma história interessante e com um elenco que cumpriu o seu dever solidamente.

Cumprimentos, Frederico Daniel.